대한체육회 회원종목단체의 굿 거버넌스 이행수준 비교분석: S4GG 굿 거버넌스 평가모델 적용

초록

The purpose of this study is not only to evaluate and compare the level of implementation of good governance by the national governing bodies of sport under the Korean Sport & Olympic Committee by applying S4GG(Sport 4(for) Good Governance) Model but also to derive policy implications for the implementation of good governance by them. The paper evaluates the level of implementation of good governance by the Korea Taekwondo Association(Group ‘가’), the Korea Basketball Association(Group ‘나’), and the Korea Archery Association(Group ‘다’). The three bodies of sport were selected as a subject of study for each evaluation group through a purposive sampling method by considering the criteria for classifying the evaluation group of “Sports Organization Innovation Evaluation”. The paper identifies similarities and differences in the evaluation results for five principles and 14 detailed indicators. The policy implications in terms of the similarities and differences are as follows. First, the three organizations should enhance administrative transparency by disclosing data related to budget and finance on their website. Second, the Korea Taekwondo Association should disclose its own “Code of Ethics” on its website and manage it so that all members comply with it. Third, the Korea Taekwondo Association and the Korea Basketball Association should establish a system to guarantee stakeholders’ participation and speaking rights by referring to the cases of the Korea Archery Association, and create an open communication atmosphere to freely present opinions and accept critical demands. In particular, the relatively small Korean Archery Association’s overall excellent level of implementation of good governance has great implications for large sporting organizations in the “A” and “B” groups.

키워드