국제스포츠조직의 굿 거버넌스 평가모델 비교 연구

초록

The purpose of this study is to compare the good governance evaluation models of international sports organizations. To achieve the purpose of the study, it conducted literature reviews of good governance principles in sport including its concept, and the models of good governance proposed by the IOC, EOC and ASOIF. The result of the study is as follows. First, the IOC’s good governance model, with seven themes, 38 principles, motivated other sports organizations to adopt good governance and provided a conceptual framework to establish a good governance evaluation model that suits their environment. Second, the EOC’s good governance model, which was applied to it, consisted of five principles, 14 indicators, and produced and published self-assesment software to check the status of performance of affiliated organizations. Third, the good governance model of the ASOIF has been presented in five principles, 50 indicators, accepting the advantages of the IOC and EOC models, and has carried out three actual assessments and is making the annual report public. The three organizations’ good governance evaluation models provide policy implications for korean sports organizations that need to establish a good governance culture, given that it is a measure to maintain the autonomy of the organization through risk management and sustainability of the olympics and sports movement.

키워드